Pearl vs Cubic zirconia
Cubic zirconia is harder (Mohs 8–8.5) than Pearl (Mohs 2.5–4.5), so it resists scratching better; Pearl is softer than quartz dust (7) and needs more care in everyday rings.
Cubic zirconia has the higher refractive index (2.15–2.18 vs 1.53–1.69), which a refractometer (over-the-limit reading) can use to separate them.
Cubic zirconia is denser (SG 5.8 vs 2.71); a cubic zirconia of the same size weighs about 114% more.
Advertisement
Ad space (in-content)
| Property | Pearl | Cubic zirconia |
|---|---|---|
| Species / material | Organic (nacre) | Synthetic zirconium oxide |
| Mohs hardness | 2.5–4.5 | 8–8.5 |
| Refractive index | 1.53–1.69 | 2.15–2.18 |
| Specific gravity | 2.71 | 5.8 |
| Crystal system | Organic | Cubic |
| Birefringence | Not applicable | None (isotropic) |
Values are typical ranges from standard gemmological references; individual stones can vary.
Test it yourself
More comparisons
Diamond vs PearlDiamond vs Cubic zirconiaRuby vs PearlRuby vs Cubic zirconiaSapphire vs PearlSapphire vs Cubic zirconiaEmerald vs PearlEmerald vs Cubic zirconiaAquamarine vs PearlAquamarine vs Cubic zirconiaMorganite vs PearlMorganite vs Cubic zirconiaAlexandrite vs PearlAlexandrite vs Cubic zirconiaSpinel vs PearlSpinel vs Cubic zirconia