Sapphire vs Cubic zirconia
Sapphire is harder (Mohs 9) than Cubic zirconia (Mohs 8–8.5), so it resists scratching better.
Cubic zirconia has the higher refractive index (2.15–2.18 vs 1.762–1.770), which a refractometer (over-the-limit reading) can use to separate them.
Cubic zirconia is denser (SG 5.8 vs 4); a cubic zirconia of the same size weighs about 45% more.
Advertisement
Ad space (in-content)
| Property | Sapphire | Cubic zirconia |
|---|---|---|
| Species / material | Corundum | Synthetic zirconium oxide |
| Mohs hardness | 9 | 8–8.5 |
| Refractive index | 1.762–1.770 | 2.15–2.18 |
| Specific gravity | 4 | 5.8 |
| Crystal system | Trigonal | Cubic |
| Birefringence | 0.008–0.010 | None (isotropic) |
Values are typical ranges from standard gemmological references; individual stones can vary.
Test it yourself
More comparisons
Diamond vs SapphireDiamond vs Cubic zirconiaRuby vs SapphireRuby vs Cubic zirconiaSapphire vs EmeraldSapphire vs AquamarineSapphire vs MorganiteSapphire vs AlexandriteSapphire vs SpinelSapphire vs TopazSapphire vs TourmalineSapphire vs Garnet (almandine)Sapphire vs PeridotSapphire vs AmethystSapphire vs CitrineSapphire vs Tanzanite