Aquamarine vs Cubic zirconia
Cubic zirconia is harder (Mohs 8–8.5) than Aquamarine (Mohs 7.5–8), so it resists scratching better.
Cubic zirconia has the higher refractive index (2.15–2.18 vs 1.577–1.583), which a refractometer (over-the-limit reading) can use to separate them.
Cubic zirconia is denser (SG 5.8 vs 2.72); a cubic zirconia of the same size weighs about 113% more.
Advertisement
Ad space (in-content)
| Property | Aquamarine | Cubic zirconia |
|---|---|---|
| Species / material | Beryl | Synthetic zirconium oxide |
| Mohs hardness | 7.5–8 | 8–8.5 |
| Refractive index | 1.577–1.583 | 2.15–2.18 |
| Specific gravity | 2.72 | 5.8 |
| Crystal system | Hexagonal | Cubic |
| Birefringence | 0.005–0.009 | None (isotropic) |
Values are typical ranges from standard gemmological references; individual stones can vary.
Test it yourself
More comparisons
Diamond vs AquamarineDiamond vs Cubic zirconiaRuby vs AquamarineRuby vs Cubic zirconiaSapphire vs AquamarineSapphire vs Cubic zirconiaEmerald vs AquamarineEmerald vs Cubic zirconiaAquamarine vs MorganiteAquamarine vs AlexandriteAquamarine vs SpinelAquamarine vs TopazAquamarine vs TourmalineAquamarine vs Garnet (almandine)Aquamarine vs PeridotAquamarine vs Amethyst