Jadeite jade vs Cubic zirconia
Cubic zirconia is harder (Mohs 8–8.5) than Jadeite jade (Mohs 6.5–7), so it resists scratching better; Jadeite jade is softer than quartz dust (7) and needs more care in everyday rings.
Cubic zirconia has the higher refractive index (2.15–2.18 vs 1.66), which a refractometer (over-the-limit reading) can use to separate them.
Cubic zirconia is denser (SG 5.8 vs 3.34); a cubic zirconia of the same size weighs about 74% more.
Advertisement
Ad space (in-content)
| Property | Jadeite jade | Cubic zirconia |
|---|---|---|
| Species / material | Jadeite (pyroxene) | Synthetic zirconium oxide |
| Mohs hardness | 6.5–7 | 8–8.5 |
| Refractive index | 1.66 | 2.15–2.18 |
| Specific gravity | 3.34 | 5.8 |
| Crystal system | Monoclinic (aggregate) | Cubic |
| Birefringence | Not usually measurable | None (isotropic) |
Values are typical ranges from standard gemmological references; individual stones can vary.
Test it yourself
More comparisons
Diamond vs Jadeite jadeDiamond vs Cubic zirconiaRuby vs Jadeite jadeRuby vs Cubic zirconiaSapphire vs Jadeite jadeSapphire vs Cubic zirconiaEmerald vs Jadeite jadeEmerald vs Cubic zirconiaAquamarine vs Jadeite jadeAquamarine vs Cubic zirconiaMorganite vs Jadeite jadeMorganite vs Cubic zirconiaAlexandrite vs Jadeite jadeAlexandrite vs Cubic zirconiaSpinel vs Jadeite jadeSpinel vs Cubic zirconia