Citrine vs Cubic zirconia
Cubic zirconia is harder (Mohs 8–8.5) than Citrine (Mohs 7), so it resists scratching better.
Cubic zirconia has the higher refractive index (2.15–2.18 vs 1.544–1.553), which a refractometer (over-the-limit reading) can use to separate them.
Cubic zirconia is denser (SG 5.8 vs 2.65); a cubic zirconia of the same size weighs about 119% more.
Advertisement
Ad space (in-content)
| Property | Citrine | Cubic zirconia |
|---|---|---|
| Species / material | Quartz | Synthetic zirconium oxide |
| Mohs hardness | 7 | 8–8.5 |
| Refractive index | 1.544–1.553 | 2.15–2.18 |
| Specific gravity | 2.65 | 5.8 |
| Crystal system | Trigonal | Cubic |
| Birefringence | 0.009 | None (isotropic) |
Values are typical ranges from standard gemmological references; individual stones can vary.
Test it yourself
More comparisons
Diamond vs CitrineDiamond vs Cubic zirconiaRuby vs CitrineRuby vs Cubic zirconiaSapphire vs CitrineSapphire vs Cubic zirconiaEmerald vs CitrineEmerald vs Cubic zirconiaAquamarine vs CitrineAquamarine vs Cubic zirconiaMorganite vs CitrineMorganite vs Cubic zirconiaAlexandrite vs CitrineAlexandrite vs Cubic zirconiaSpinel vs CitrineSpinel vs Cubic zirconia