Amethyst vs Zircon
Amethyst is harder (Mohs 7) than Zircon (Mohs 6.5–7.5), so it resists scratching better; Zircon is softer than quartz dust (7) and needs more care in everyday rings.
Zircon has the higher refractive index (1.925–1.984 vs 1.544–1.553), which a refractometer (over-the-limit reading) can use to separate them.
Zircon is denser (SG 4.69 vs 2.65); a zircon of the same size weighs about 77% more.
Advertisement
Ad space (in-content)
| Property | Amethyst | Zircon |
|---|---|---|
| Species / material | Quartz | Zircon |
| Mohs hardness | 7 | 6.5–7.5 |
| Refractive index | 1.544–1.553 | 1.925–1.984 |
| Specific gravity | 2.65 | 4.69 |
| Crystal system | Trigonal | Tetragonal |
| Birefringence | 0.009 | 0.059 |
Values are typical ranges from standard gemmological references; individual stones can vary.
Test it yourself
More comparisons
Diamond vs AmethystDiamond vs ZirconRuby vs AmethystRuby vs ZirconSapphire vs AmethystSapphire vs ZirconEmerald vs AmethystEmerald vs ZirconAquamarine vs AmethystAquamarine vs ZirconMorganite vs AmethystMorganite vs ZirconAlexandrite vs AmethystAlexandrite vs ZirconSpinel vs AmethystSpinel vs Zircon